Why d300s better than d7000
When I moved up from a previous model I thought my images were soft. After I learned more on how to use the camera, finding the sweet spots, then everything will be fine. You will have the same quirks whenever you move to a newer body. Mainly because, you are comparing it to what you use to shoot with. It's just buying a new car. You have to adjust to the newer surroundings. Look at what your needs are first. If its a faster focusing or bigger body, then get the Ds. If you add some nice glass to your bag, you won't have to worry about what's going to happen in the next 6yrs.
I've see some great shots from people still using the D Like zemlinphoto said get the D Hi all Thanks a lot for your help. I just tweaked some settings and images looks good now.
As suggested I feel that if I will spend some more time with it, images will get better. I was faced with the same problem - Ds vs D - picked up the Ds for the simple fact that it is proven technology with outstanding quality both image and build.
No regrets A picture is worth a thousand words. Not to knock Nikon but I have read many complaints about the 7k..
Aimed higher than it's buyers abilities. Edited by dhaneshr member 9 years ago. Go read [ bythom. Having said that, I bought the Ds after the D was launched. For me, it was the ergonomics, large buffer for continuous shots in RAW mode, lot's of buttons and switches, point AF, and super exposure bracketing. And it is really built like a tank. This worked for me but perhaps not for you. That wasn't a deal breaker for me though as most of my shots are in broad daylight.
Make an analysis of your past shots, incld. In Malaysia, currently the D comes free with a Nikon 50mm f1. I feel it would be just an incremental upgrade perhaps newer sensor, better ISO, more MP , so you may not loose much investing in a D today. I feel that if you got some nice glass and a Nikon DSLR that feels good in your hands, you can't go wrong.
Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market. The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. A large sensor will generally have larger individual pixels that offer better low-light sensitivity, provide wider dynamic range , and have richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation.
Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors are more costly to manufacture and tend to lead to bigger and heavier cameras and lenses. Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor , but their sensors differ slightly in size.
The sensor area in the D is 1 percent smaller. They nevertheless have the same format factor of 1. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio sensor width to sensor height of Despite having a slightly smaller sensor, the D offers a higher resolution of This megapixels advantage comes at the cost of a higher pixel density and a smaller size of the individual pixel with a pixel pitch of 4. However, it should be noted that the D is a somewhat more recent model by 1 year and 1 month than the DS, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time that partly offset its pixel-size disadvantage.
The resolution advantage of the Nikon D implies greater flexibility for cropping images or the possibility to print larger pictures. The maximum print size of the D for good quality output dots per inch amounts to The corresponding values for the Nikon DS are Since , DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology.
Of the two cameras under consideration, the D has a markedly higher DXO score than the DS overall score 10 points higher , which will translate into better image quality. The advantage is based on 1 bits higher color depth, 1. The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras. Many modern cameras cannot only take still pictures, but also record videos.
Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the D provides a better video resolution than the DS. Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features.
The DS and the D are similar in the sense that both have an optical viewfinder. The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Nikon DS and Nikon D in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.
Both cameras feature dual card slots , which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process.
The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Nikon DS and Nikon D and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras and selected comparators provide for accessory control and data transfer. Studio photographers will appreciate that the Nikon DS unlike the D features a PC Sync socket , so that professional strobe lights can be controlled by the camera. The maximum resolution available for videos shot with the main camera. Although it may be possible to choose among other frame rates, those recordings usually have lower resolutions.
A phase-detection autofocus system is faster than a contrast detection autofocus system. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear.
When recording movies they stay focussed and sharp. A timelapse shows a long passage of time sped up. A series of photographs taken from the same position over a long period is joined together to create a short video. It is great way to capture things like the setting sun, or clouds moving across the sky. Nowadays, it is used to create film-like motion characteristics. Audio 1. A microphone port allows connecting external high-end or specialized microphones. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone.
More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. Battery 1. Battery life CIPA shots. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies.
The battery is removable and can be replaced by the user if broken. The battery can be recharged and used over again. An indicator shows you when the device has low battery. Battery power, or battery capacity, represents the amount of electrical energy that a battery can store. More battery power can be an indication of longer battery life.
Features 1. The maximum ISO at which the device still captures excellent quality images. Source: DxOMark. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. The better a device's color depth the more color nuances it can distinguish. The device has a standard memory slot such as an SD or micro SD card slot that enables you to extend the built-in internal storage with affordable memory modules, or easily retrieve data, such as photographs, from the memory card.
The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. Raw files are so named because they are not yet processed and therefore are not ready to be printed or edited with a bitmap graphics editor.
0コメント